Claude answers API

aivisibilityskill returns Claude's answer to a question as JSON, from Anthropic's Claude model with its web search tool on: the brands it names in order and whether it recommends them, every citation with its source type, and the raw response with its SHA-256 hash. It's asked through the API, not the claude.ai app, costs $0.06 an answer, and failed answers are never charged.

Asks
Anthropic's Claude model, with Claude's web search tool on
Returns
The answer, brands in order, every citation, facts and the raw response
Countries
Any of 250 countries and territories, told to the model
Price per answer
$0.06 (live); half for a reused answer
Speed
Live only, one call per answer
Try it
Free sandbox keys and 500 free credits, no card
Request
curl https://api.aivisibilityskill.com/v1/checks \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer $AIV_KEY" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{
    "questions": ["best CRM for early-stage startups"],
    "engines": ["claude"],
    "locale": "en-US",
    "mode": "live",
    "wait": 60
  }'
Response, shortened200
{
  "status": "succeeded",
  "credits": { "quoted": 60, "charged": 60 },
  "answers": [
    {
      "engine": "claude",
      "surface": "api",
      "question": "best CRM for early-stage startups",
      "locale": "en-US",
      "has_ai_answer": true,
      "brands": [
        { "name": "HubSpot", "rank": 1, "recommended": true,
          "sentiment": "positive",
          "quote": "HubSpot Free is the most common default." },
        { "name": "Pipedrive", "rank": 2, "recommended": true,
          "sentiment": "positive",
          "quote": "suits teams that mainly want a pipeline" }
      ],
      "facts": [
        {
          "brand": "Pipedrive",
          "type": "price",
          "value": "$12.50 per user/mo",
          "price": { "amount": 12.5, "currency": "USD", "period": "month",
            "per_user": true }
        }
      ],
      "citations": [
        { "position": 3, "domain": "saasworthy.com",
          "source_type": "review_site" },
        { "position": 4, "domain": "techradar.com", "source_type": "media" }
      ],
      "receipt": { "sha256": "…", "url": "…/receipt" }
    }
  ]
}
Fig. 1One live Claude answer for “best CRM for early-stage startups”. The values are the real ones the API returned on October 29, 2026, shortened to two brands and two citations. Every field is in the API reference.

What the Claude API returns

With web search on, Claude reads a handful of pages and writes a short, careful answer. Each one comes back read the same way as the other engines: brands in order, every citation typed, and the raw response kept as proof.

What each answer includes
FieldWhat it holds
has_ai_answerfalse when the engine showed no AI answer (for example, no AI Overview for that query).
textThe full answer, as markdown.
brands[].name, rankEvery brand the answer names, in order of first mention (rank 1 = named first).
brands[].recommended, sentiment, quoteWhether it recommends the brand, the tone (positive, neutral, negative) and the exact words.
citations[].position, url, domain, titleEvery source the answer cites, in the order it cites them.
citations[].source_typeWhat kind of site each source is: brand_owned, review_site, media, reddit, youtube, wikipedia, forum, social, blog_platform, marketplace, gov_edu or other.
facts[]Claims about each brand (price, plan, free tier, platform, feature) with the quote they came from; prices parsed into amount, currency and period.
model, locale, collected_atThe model the engine reported, the country and language asked from, and when.
receipt.sha256, receipt.urlThe engine's raw response, stored as returned, and its SHA-256 hash.

Claude SEO: what decides which brands Claude names

When Claude searches, it summarises what the pages it found agree on. Its answer to the CRM question began: “across the 2026 roundups I found, a few tools come up repeatedly.” It cited six pages, mostly roundups and review sites (techsifted.com, startupik.com, saasworthy.com, techradar.com), plus folk.app, the site of a brand it then recommended. So the way into Claude's answers is the same as for the other engines: get onto the roundups it reads. The API shows exactly which ones those are for each question.

One question, three different answers

We asked “best CRM for early-stage startups” on each engine from the US on the same morning. Each card is what the API returned: how the answer opens, the brands it named in order, and the first sites it cited.

  • Claudeapi

    best CRM for early-stage startups

    The best choice depends on your sales motion and budget, but across the 2026 roundups I found, a few tools come up repeatedly.

    Names, in order

    1. HubSpot
    2. Pipedrive
    3. Bigin by Zoho CRM
    4. Folk
    5. Attio
    6. Close
    7. Copper

    Cites 6 sources, starting with

    techsifted.comstartupik.comsaasworthy.com
  • ChatGPTapp

    best CRM for early-stage startups

    My recommendation: start with Attio if you're building a tech startup, or HubSpot if you want a free, all-purpose sales and marketing platform.

    Names, in order

    1. Attio
    2. HubSpot
    3. Pipedrive
    4. Zoho CRM
    5. Close

    Cites 10 sources, starting with

    hackceleration.comsoftwarecompare.netstackbytrade.com
    ChatGPT API
  • Perplexityapi

    best CRM for early-stage startups

    The best CRM for an early-stage startup is usually the simplest one your team will actually use …

    Names, in order

    1. HubSpot
    2. Less Annoying CRM
    3. Attio
    4. Pipedrive
    5. Zoho
    6. Zoho Bigin
    7. Salesforce Starter

    and 3 more

    Cites 17 links from 15 sites, starting with

    techradar.comsalesforce.comslack.com
    Perplexity API
Fig. 2Real answers to “best CRM for early-stage startups” (en-US), collected October 29, 2026. Openings shortened where marked with …; brands are listed as the API read them.
Where each answer ranks each brand (1 = named first; – = not named)
Brand
HubSpot121
Pipedrive234
Bigin3– not named6
Folk4– not named9
Attio513
Close65– not named
Copper7– not named– not named
Zoho CRM– not named45
Less Annoying CRM– not named– not named2
Salesforce Starter– not named– not named7

All three name HubSpot, Pipedrive and Attio. Claude puts HubSpot first, as Perplexity does, while ChatGPT leads with Attio. Claude is the only one to recommend Copper, and it shares just one source with ChatGPT (techradar.com) and two with Perplexity (techradar.com and folk.app).

Calling Claude's web search yourself vs aivisibilityskill

You can call Claude with its web search tool yourself. You'd get the answer and its sources, and still have to read the answer for brands, track it over time and keep the same format for every other engine. That's what this API does.

Calling Claude yourself vs through aivisibilityskill
The answer and its sourcesYesYes
Brands namedYou parse them yourselfListed with rank, recommendation and sentiment
Source typesNoEvery citation typed
BillingTokens plus searchesOne price per answer; failed answers are free
ChatGPT, Gemini, Google AI and othersNoYes, in the same call

As with the other model APIs, this is Claude through the API with a fresh conversation, not the claude.ai app with a person's own history and settings.

Track brand mentions in Claude

Put a brand, its competitors and its buyers' questions in a project with a daily or weekly schedule. The API returns how often Claude names the brand (with error bars), each competitor's share, the sites Claude cites and the history, and a webhook tells your server when each run is done.

Call the Claude API from TypeScript or Python

The SDKs wrap the same request, retry safely without charging twice, and wait for the answers for you. Free sandbox keys (aiv_test_…) return realistic sample answers, so you can build the whole feature before spending a credit.

TypeScript (npm install @aivisibilityskill/sdk)

import { Aiv } from "@aivisibilityskill/sdk";

const aiv = new Aiv({ apiKey: process.env.AIV_KEY! });

const job = await aiv.checks.create({
  questions: ["best CRM for early-stage startups"],
  engines: ["claude"],
  locale: "en-US",
});
const done = await aiv.jobs.wait(job.id);

for (const answer of done.answers ?? []) {
  console.log(answer.brands?.map((b) => `${b.rank}. ${b.name}`));
  console.log(answer.citations?.map((c) => c.domain));
}

Python (pip install aivisibilityskill)

import os
from aivisibilityskill import Aiv

aiv = Aiv(api_key=os.environ["AIV_KEY"])

job = aiv.checks.create(
    ["best CRM for early-stage startups"],
    engines=["claude"],
    locale="en-US",
)
done = aiv.jobs.wait(job["id"])

for answer in done["answers"]:
    print([(b["rank"], b["name"]) for b in answer["brands"]])
    print([c["domain"] for c in answer["citations"]])

For thousands of questions, send them as one batch of up to 20,000 answers and get one webhook when it's done. Full guides: SDKs, API reference, OpenAPI 3.1 spec.

Prefer a ready-made tool? llm-brand-tracker on GitHub tracks your brand against competitors on all 8 engines every week, free on GitHub Actions. Free and MIT licensed.

Claude API pricing

You pay per answer, in credits. Claude is asked live, one call per answer, so there's one speed. A dollar buys 1,000 credits on a pack; monthly and volume plans include more. An answer reused from a recent identical one (max_age_hours) costs half, and an answer that fails costs nothing.

Claude answer prices
SpeedReadyCreditsPay as you goBusiness and Enterprise plansReused answer
LiveUsually under a minute60$0.06$0.037530 credits

Every account gets the same API and every engine, starting with 500 free credits and no card. Volume plans start at $500 a month for 750,000 credits, with invoicing and a 99.5% uptime commitment: see volume plans.

Countries and languages

Claude is asked through its API, so it isn't answering from a location. For any locale other than en-US, it's told which country the buyer is in, for any of 250 countries and territories, and it answers in the question's language (de-DE, pt-BR, ja-JP…). The app and search engines answer from the country itself: ChatGPT in 192, Gemini, Google AI Overviews and AI Mode in 240. GET /v1/locales lists every pair for free.

Questions

Is this the claude.ai app's answer?

No. It's Claude through Anthropic's model API with its web search tool on, asked as a fresh conversation. The claude.ai app can answer differently, depending on a person's settings and history.

Which Claude model answers?

A current Claude model with web search; every answer's model field says exactly which one answered.

How do I get my brand recommended by Claude?

Claude builds its answer from the pages its search finds, mostly roundups, comparisons and review sites. Find which pages it cites for your buyers' questions (the API lists them, with types), then get onto those pages or publish a better one.

Does it return Claude's citations?

Yes. Every citation comes back in order, with its URL, domain, page title and a source type such as review_site, media or brand_owned.

How much does the Claude API cost?

60 credits an answer: $0.06 at pay-as-you-go rates and about $0.0375 on volume plans. A recent identical answer reused with max_age_hours costs 30 credits. Failed answers are never charged.

Can I ask Claude from another country?

Yes. For any locale other than en-US, Claude is told which country the buyer is in, for any of 250 countries and territories, and it answers in the question's language.

Build on Claude answers. We'll keep them coming.

Start with a free sandbox key and 500 credits. When your product grows, volume plans and an uptime commitment are a reply away.

500 free credits, no card. Sign in with Google or email.